The recognition of ancestors

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The recognition of ancestors is problematic using cladistic logic alone because monophyletic groups (clades) are defined by shared derived characters (synapomorphies) which their ancestors must have lacked. Nevertheless, ancestors possess three key attributes. They belong within a larger, paraphyletic group. They will be morphologically most similar to their immediate descendants, and they evolved before any and all of their descendants. Recognition of ancestors requires both morphological and stratigraphic data and, in practice, the task is to reduce the size of the paraphyletic group within which the ancestor must lie. All ancestor‐descendant relationships are phylogenetic hypotheses. Despite the legendary incompleteness of the fossil record, testing the validity of available data is far more difficult for character analysis than for stratigraphy.