Comparison between sample-species specific uncertainties and estimated uncertainties for the source apportionment of the speciation trends network data
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Atmospheric Environment
- Vol. 41 (3) , 567-575
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.023
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of Fine Particle Sources in Mid-Atlantic US AreaWater, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2005
- Estimation of Organic Carbon Blank Values and Error Structures of the Speciation Trends Network Data for Source ApportionmentJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005
- Improving source identification of fine particles in a rural northeastern U.S. area utilizing temperature‐resolved carbon fractionsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004
- Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix FactorizationJournal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2003
- Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic modelsPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Understanding and controlling rotations in factor analytic modelsChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2002
- Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysisChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1997
- Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel ExhaustAerosol Science and Technology, 1996
- Direct determination of the phase distributions of semi-volatile polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using annular denudersAtmospheric Environment, 1995
- Current factor analysis receptor models are ill-posedAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1987