Modelling risk when binary outcomes are subject to error
- 23 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 23 (7) , 1095-1109
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1656
Abstract
We present methods for binomial regression when the outcome is determined using the results of a single diagnostic test with imperfect sensitivity and specificity. We present our model, illustrate it with the analysis of real data, and provide an example of WinBUGS program code for performing such an analysis. Conditional means priors are used in order to allow for inclusion of prior data and expert opinion in the estimation of odds ratios, probabilities, risk ratios, risk differences, and diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity. A simple method of obtaining Bayes factors for link selection is presented. Methods are illustrated and compared with Bayesian ordinary binary regression using data from a study of the effectiveness of a smoking cessation program among pregnant women. Regression coefficient estimates are shown to change noticeably when expert prior knowledge and imperfect sensitivity and specificity are incorporated into the model. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising arable cropsFEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2001
- General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative SimulationsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 1998
- Probability Logic and Probabilistic InductionEpidemiology, 1998
- Bayesian Binomial Regression: Predicting Survival at a Trauma CenterThe American Statistician, 1997
- Logistic Regression When the Outcome Is Measured with UncertaintyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- A New Perspective on Priors for Generalized Linear ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings AlgorithmThe American Statistician, 1995
- Bayes FactorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Random Within-Person Measurement ErrorAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- BIAS DUE TO MISCLASSIFICATION IN THE ESTIMATION OF RELATIVE RISKAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977