A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATIC BLOCK FOR TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA: THE EMORY UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 162 (5) , 1636-1639
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68185-2
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and role of transperineal prostate block in providing anesthesia during minimally invasive radio frequency thermal therapy of the prostate. Materials and Methods: A total of 38 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral needle ablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were entered in this prospective study. All patients received transperineal prostatic block as the main method of anesthesia. A mixture of equal volumes of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine, each with epinephrine (1:100,000 concentration ratio) was used. Pain control during the instillation of transperineal prostatic block and transurethral needle ablation was assessed using a 10-point linear analog pain scale and questionnaire. Results: Median patient age was 65.5 years (range 47 to 79), with 21% of men in the eighth decade of life. Median American Urological Association symptom score was 25.0 (range 14 to 35), bother score was 20.0 (11 to 28), quality of life score was 4.0 (3 to 6) and peak urinary flow rate was 8.9 cc per second (3.5 to 15.7). Median sonographic prostate volume was 35.0 cc (range 17 to 129). Median volume of anesthetic agent used was 40.0 cc (range 30 to 60) per case (1.1 cc solution per 1 cc prostate tissue). No adverse events were encountered. Median pain score was 3.3 (range 1 to 6) during instillation of transperineal prostatic block and 1.0 (0 to 6) during transurethral needle ablation. Transperineal prostatic block proved highly effective and was a satisfactory method of anesthesia during transurethral needle ablation as judged by postoperative questionnaire. No sedation, narcotic or analgesia was required. All procedures were performed in the outpatient cystoscopy suite or office setting without support of an anesthesia team or conscious sedation monitoring. Conclusions: Transperineal prostatic block is a safe, convenient, effective and satisfactory method of minimally invasive anesthesia for transurethral needle ablation of the prostate in an outpatient office setting. Elderly patients and those at high surgical risk can be treated safely using this approach. Considerable cost saving is seen secondary to omission of charges related to anesthesia team support, recovery room facility and conscious sedation monitoring.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prostate anesthetic block for outpatient prostate surgeryWorld Journal of Urology, 1998
- AN OPEN STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION OF THE PROSTATE IN TREATING SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA: THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 1998
- Preservation of Putative Continence Nerves during Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Leads to More Rapid Return of Urinary ContinenceUrology, 1998
- A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED 1-YEAR CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIAJournal of Urology, 1998
- Transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results of a prospective, multicenter U.S. studyUrology, 1998
- Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincterUrology, 1997
- Nerve Block in Prostate SurgeryJournal of Urology, 1996
- Transurethral Resection of the Prostate with Local Anesthesia in 100 PatientsJournal of Urology, 1986
- Urological Endoscopic Surgery Under Local Anesthesia: A Cost-Reducing IdeaJournal of Urology, 1984
- The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating painAnaesthesia, 1976