THE ADOPTION OF THE MULTIDIVISIONAL FORM OF ORGANIZATION: A CONTINGENCY MODEL*
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Management Studies
- Vol. 29 (1) , 49-72
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00652.x
Abstract
This article examines the proposition that the multidivisional structure is determined by both power and efficiency imperatives. It is theorized that combining the coalitional power and information‐processing perspectives of organizational choice enables us to explain and predict organizational form. The theory is tested on 291 Fortune 500 firms. The results largely confirm theoretical expectations. It is submitted that the multidivisional paradigm illustrates the central premises of the article: (1) a synthesis of efficiency and power perspectives is a viable research programme; and (2) theoretical pluralism increases empirical content and should be valued by those concerned with progress in the emerging field of strategic management.This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strategic control systems and relative r&d investment in large multiproduct firmsStrategic Management Journal, 1988
- Transaction cost analysis of strategy‐structure choiceStrategic Management Journal, 1988
- A Comment on Presenting Results from Logit and Probit ModelsAmerican Sociological Review, 1985
- DIVERSIFICATION WITHIN AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISEJournal of Management Studies, 1984
- Agency Problems and Residual ClaimsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- The Importance of an Integrative Approach to Strategic Management ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1981
- Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate MergersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981
- The Strategy and structure of top 100 Japanese industrial enterprises 1950–1970Strategic Management Journal, 1980
- Choosing between Logistic Regression and Discriminant AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978
- Organizational Structure and the Multinational StrategyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1968