Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 91 (2) , 153-161
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-6497-9
Abstract
Background. Over 80 of women diagnosed with breast cancer will be survivors. We sought to determine the economic consequences of surviving breast cancer. Methods. Disease-free survivors who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II breast cancer on CALGB study 8541 participated in a study of long-term outcomes. Survey responses were used to determine the types and frequency of medical resources used in follow-up, annual direct medical costs, and survivor perceptions of the personal economic impact of breast cancer. Results. 245 of 314 (78%) invited breast cancer survivors (median follow-up 12.2 years, range 9.3–16.4) completed the surveys. Eighty-seven percent reported having cancer specialist follow-up in the past year. The following percentages of survivors reported having had, for breast cancer follow-up, at least once in the past year: breast examination 92%, mammogram 88, bone scan 18%, chest radiograph 59%, tumor marker studies 37%. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used at least according to published follow-up guidelines, or over-used. Median annual cost of follow-up per survivor was $630 (range $0–10,817) with higher costs associated with medical oncology follow-up, lower income, and younger age. Few women reported a negative impact of breast cancer on employment, but 16% reported being denied life insurance. Conclusions. Among long-term breast cancer survivors, patient self-report data suggest that over-use of medical resources for follow-up appears common. When follow-up care included a medical oncologist, resources were more likely to be used appropriately, or over-used. Costs of follow-up are higher with medical oncology follow-up, lower income and among younger survivors. The annual cost of follow-up varies widely and may be driven by over-use of follow-up tests.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Care for Survivors of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Comparison of psychosocial adaptation of advanced stage Hodgkin’s disease and acute leukemia survivorsAnnals of Oncology, 1998
- Economic analysis of a randomized clinical trial to compare filgrastim-mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor-cell transplantation and autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-upJAMA, 1994
- Adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer and incidence of new primary malignanciesThe Lancet, 1991
- How valid are mammography self-reports?American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- Pregnancy and offspring after adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patientsCancer, 1990
- Second malignancies after CMF for resectable breast cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Leukemia in breast cancer patients following adjuvant chemotherapy or postoperative radiation: the NSABP experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Early and delayed clinical cardiotoxicity of doxorubicinCancer, 1985