The Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations by Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate or Tiotropium Bromide
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 177 (1) , 19-26
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200707-973oc
Abstract
Exacerbations are key drivers of morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared the relative efficacy of the long-acting inhaled bronchodilator/antiinflammatory combination (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate) 50/500 microg twice daily and the long-acting bronchodilator (tiotropium) 18 microg once daily in preventing exacerbations and related outcomes in severe and very severe COPD. A total of 1,323 patients (mean age, 64 yr, post-bronchodilator FEV1, 39% predicted) were randomized in this 2-year, double-blind, double-dummy parallel study. Primary endpoint was health care utilization exacerbation rate. Other endpoints included health status measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), mortality, adverse events, and study withdrawal. Probability of withdrawing from the study was 29% greater with tiotropium than salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (P = 0.005). The modeled annual exacerbation rate was 1.28 in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group and 1.32 in the tiotropium group (rate ratio, 0.967; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.836-1.119]; P = 0.656). The SGRQ total score was statistically significantly lower at 2 years on salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus tiotropium (difference 2.1 units; 95% CI, 0.1-4.0; P = 0.038). Mortality was significantly lower in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group; 21 (3%) of patients in this group died compared with 38 (6%) in the tiotropium group (P = 0.032). More pneumonias were reported in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate group relative to tiotropium (P = 0.008). We found no difference in exacerbation rate between salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and tiotropium. More patients failed to complete the study while receiving tiotropium. A small statistically significant beneficial effect was found on health status, with an unexpected finding of lower deaths in salmeterol/fluticasone propionate-treated patients. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00361959).Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate on airway inflammation in COPD: a randomised controlled trialThorax, 2007
- Analysis of exacerbation rates in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: example from the TRISTAN studyPharmaceutical Statistics, 2007
- Investigating New Standards for Prophylaxis in Reduction of Exacerbations—The INSPIRE Study MethodologyCOPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2007
- Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysisThorax, 2006
- COPD exacerbations {middle dot} 4: PreventionThorax, 2006
- Anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: similarities and differences to asthmaExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 2005
- The Nature of Small-Airway Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Maintenance therapy with budesonide and formoterol in chronicobstructive pulmonary diseaseEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2003
- Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2003
- Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseThorax, 2001