Matching PET and CT scans of the head and neck area: Development of method and validation
- 12 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 29 (10) , 2230-2238
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1508111
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) provides important information on tumor biology, but lacks detailed anatomical information. Our aim in the present study was to develop and validate an automatic registration method for matching PET and CT scans of the head and neck. Three difficulties in achieving this goal are (1) nonrigid motions of the neck can hamper the use of automatic ridged body transformations; (2) emission scans contain too little anatomical information to apply standard image fusion methods; and (3) no objective way exists to quantify the quality of the match results. These problems are solved as follows: accurate and reproducible positioning of the patient was achieved by using a radiotherapy treatment mask. The proposed method makes use of the transmission rather than the emission scan. To obtain sufficient (anatomical) information for matching, two bed positions for the transmission scan were included in the protocol. A mutual information-based algorithm was used as a registration technique. PET and CT data were obtained in seven patients. Each patient had two CT scans and one PET scan. The datasets were used to estimate the consistency by matching PET to CT1, CT1 to CT2, and CT2 to PET using the full circle consistency test. It was found that using our method, consistency could be obtained of 4 mm and 1.3 degrees on average. The PET voxels used for registration were 5.15 mm, so the errors compared quite favorably with the voxel size. Cropping the images (removing the scanner bed from images) did not improve the consistency of the algorithm. The transmission scan, however, could potentially be reduced to a single position using this approach. In conclusion, the represented algorithm and validation technique has several features that are attractive from both theoretical and practical point of view, it is a user-independent, automatic validation technique for matching CT and PET scans of the head and neck, which gives the opportunity to compare different image enhancements.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiosynthesis of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine: [18F]FLT for imaging of cellular proliferation in vivoNuclear Medicine and Biology, 2000
- Registration of MR and SPECT without using external fiducial markersPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1998
- Monitoring of Response to Radiotherapy with Fluorine-18 Deoxyglucose PET of Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomasActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1998
- Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual informationIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1997
- Validation and clinical application of computer-combined computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose head and neck imagesThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- A Fully Automatic Multimodality Image Registration AlgorithmJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1995
- Spatial registration and normalization of imagesHuman Brain Mapping, 1995
- Pilot study of positron emission tomography in patients with advanced head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapyHead & Neck, 1994
- V. Anatomical ConsiderationsJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1987
- Measurement of blood flow, oxygen utilisation, oxygen extraction ratio, and fractional blood volume in human brain tumours and surrounding oedematous tissueThe British Journal of Radiology, 1985