Phase II Study of Daily Sunitinib in FDG-PET–Positive, Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Metastatic Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid with Functional Imaging Correlation
Top Cited Papers
- 31 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 16 (21) , 5260-5268
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0994
Abstract
Purpose: We conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy of continuous dosing of sunitinib in patients with flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)–avid, iodine-refractory well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and to assess for early response per FDG-PET. Experimental Design: Patients had metastatic, iodine-refractory WDTC or MTC with FDG-PET–avid disease. Sunitinib was administered at 37.5 mg daily on a continuous basis. The primary end point was response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary end points included toxicity, overall survival, and time to progression. We conducted an exploratory analysis of FDG-PET response after 7 days of treatment. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled (7 MTC, 28 WDTC), and 33 patients were evaluable for disease response. The primary end point, objective response rate per RECIST, was 11 patients (31%; 95% confidence interval, 16-47%). There were 1 complete response (3%), 10 partial responses (28%), and 16 patients (46%) with stable disease. Progressive disease was seen in 6 patients (17%). The median time to progression was 12.8 months (95% confidence interval, 8.9 months-not reached). Repeat FDG-PET was done on 22 patients. The median percent change in average standardized uptake values was −11.7%, −13.9%, and 8.6% for patients with RECIST response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. Differences between response categories were statistically significant (P = 0.03). The most common toxicities seen included fatigue (11%), neutropenia (34%), hand/foot syndrome (17%), diarrhea (17%), and leukopenia (31%). One patient on anticoagulation died of gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusion: Continuous administration of sunitinib was effective in patients with iodine-refractory WDTC and MTC. Further study is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 16(21); 5260–8. ©2010 AACR.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of Motesanib in Patients With Progressive or Symptomatic, Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failureEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2009
- 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging for an Early Assessment of Response to Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma: Preliminary StudyCancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals, 2009
- Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Advanced Thyroid CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Thyroid carcinoma: molecular pathways and therapeutic targetsLaboratory Investigation, 2008
- Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C Correlates With Lymph Node Metastases and High-Risk Tumor Profiles in Papillary Thyroid CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Cancer Statistics, 2008CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- New therapeutic approaches for metastatic thyroid carcinomaThe Lancet Oncology, 2007
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000