Norms and Folkways in Congress: How Much Has Actually Changed?
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Congress & the Presidency
- Vol. 15 (2) , 117-138
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07343468809507941
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to question the widely-accepted notion that the basic norms of the United States Congress have undergone a dramatic change. In the face of an increased workload, a more divisive political environment, and significant alterations of the formal rules, this article suggests that the basic "folkways" of the House and Senate in the 1980s are remarkably similar to those described by students of Congress three decades ago. Despite some interview evidence to the contrary, patterns of legislative behavior, distinctions between "insiders" and "outsiders," and the pathways to legislative power continue to be defined in terms of such basic norms as reciprocity, apprenticeship, and specialization.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evolutionary Approach to NormsAmerican Political Science Review, 1986
- Unanimous Consent Agreements: Going Along in the SenateThe Journal of Politics, 1986
- Changing the Guard in the U. S. SenateLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1984
- Legislators as Budget Initiators and LobbyistsAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1984
- Subcommittee Government in the U. S. House: An Analysis of Bill ManagementLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1982
- The Learning of Legislative NormsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Inside BureaucracyPublished by Rand Corporation ,1967
- Party Loyalty Among CongressmenPublished by Harvard University Press ,1966
- American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political TheoryWorld Politics, 1964
- The Outsider in the Senate: An Alternative RoleAmerican Political Science Review, 1961