Health and Economic Implications of HPV Vaccination in the United States
Top Cited Papers
- 21 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 359 (8) , 821-832
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0707052
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus types 16 (HPV-16) and 18 (HPV-18) is an important consideration for guidelines for immunization in the United States. We synthesized epidemiologic and demographic data using models of HPV-16 and HPV-18 transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to compare the health and economic outcomes of vaccinating preadolescent girls (at 12 years of age) and vaccinating older girls and women in catch-up programs (to 18, 21, or 26 years of age). We examined the health benefits of averting other HPV-16–related and HPV-18–related cancers, the prevention of HPV-6–related and HPV-11–related genital warts and juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis by means of the quadrivalent vaccine, the duration of immunity, and future screening practices. On the assumption that the vaccine provided lifelong immunity, the cost-effectiveness ratio of vaccination of 12-year-old girls was $43,600 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, as compared with the current screening practice. Under baseline assumptions, the cost-effectiveness ratio for extending a temporary catch-up program for girls to 18 years of age was $97,300 per QALY; the cost of extending vaccination of girls and women to the age of 21 years was $120,400 per QALY, and the cost for extension to the age of 26 years was $152,700 per QALY. The results were sensitive to the duration of vaccine-induced immunity; if immunity waned after 10 years, the cost of vaccination of preadolescent girls exceeded $140,000 per QALY, and catch-up strategies were less cost-effective than screening alone. The cost-effectiveness ratios for vaccination strategies were more favorable if the benefits of averting other health conditions were included or if screening was delayed and performed at less frequent intervals and with more sensitive tests; they were less favorable if vaccinated girls were preferentially screened more frequently in adulthood. The cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination will depend on the duration of vaccine immunity and will be optimized by achieving high coverage in preadolescent girls, targeting initial catch-up efforts to women up to 18 or 21 years of age, and revising screening policies.This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- The economic burden of noncervical human papillomavirus disease in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
- Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening With Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing and HPV-16,18 VaccinationJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening testsPublished by Elsevier ,2007
- The value of including boys in an HPV vaccination programme: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a low-resource settingBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Model for Assessing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination StrategiesEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Epidemiology of HPV 16 and Cervical Cancer in Finland and the Potential Impact of Vaccination: Mathematical Modelling AnalysesPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Assessing the Annual Economic Burden of Preventing and Treating Anogenital Human Papillomavirus-Related Disease in the USPharmacoEconomics, 2005
- Interim Guidance for the Use of Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing as an Adjunct to Cervical Cytology for ScreeningObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysisBritish Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysisBritish Journal of Cancer, 2003