THE DYING OF CLASS OR OR MARXIST CLASS THEORY?
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Sociology
- Vol. 8 (3) , 279-292
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026858093008003002
Abstract
Following some terminological clarifications, this article assesses the utility of the concept of class, and the Marxist class theory, for the analysis of stratification and conflict in advanced societies. The conclusions support the arguments of Clark and Lipset (1991). What is `dying' (in Clark and Lipset's parlance) are mainly the old industrial classes: the old socio-economic divisions, the old institutional actors representing these divisions, and the old forms of identification cum consciousness that reflected them. This reflects fragmentation of stratification due to proliferation of property ownership, credentialisation and professionalisation, state regulation, consumption orientation, proliferation of `imagined communities', and formation of new political actors. With these processes, and the revolutionary transformations in the ex-Soviet bloc, the theoretical and analytical edifice of Marxism loses much of its ground.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mass Social Movements and Social ClassInternational Sociology, 1993
- ETACRATISM: POWER AND PROPERTY—EVIDENCE FROM THE SOVIET EXPERIENCEInternational Sociology, 1992
- Generational Replacement and Value Change in Eight West European SocietiesBritish Journal of Political Science, 1992
- ARE SOCIAL CLASSES DYING?International Sociology, 1991
- Outline of a Theory of CitizenshipSociology, 1990
- Citizenship and the Constitution of Structured Social Inequality1International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 1989
- Value Change in Industrial SocietiesAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- Post-Materialism in an Environment of InsecurityAmerican Political Science Review, 1981
- Concept Misformation in Comparative PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1970
- Some Principles of StratificationAmerican Sociological Review, 1945