Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients.
Open Access
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- case report
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 15 (4) , 186-190
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.15.4.186
Abstract
The problem of psychological pain caused by discussions of do not resuscitate status with patients is addressed. Case histories of patients with such distress are given. We propose that not all patients should be informed of their do not resuscitate status, that the information about such status be given incrementally, and that the giving of further information be guided by the patient's reaction to earlier information. While some affirm the duty of the physician always to inform the patient about his or her do not resuscitate status, we affirm the duty of the physician to determine whether the patient wishes to enter into this discussion.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Do Not Resuscitate PolicyPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1988
- Initiating and Withdrawing Life SupportNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Respecting the Autonomy of Competent PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- “Code” or “No Code”: A Nonlegal OpinionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979