Structure of the recall process
- 11 August 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Vol. 302 (1110) , 373-385
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1983.0061
Abstract
It is often appropriate to analyse memory processes at a binary level corresponding to the individual item, which may be either remembered or not. But an alternative, considered here, is to study memory for material that is explicitly multicomponent in nature. This procedure is necessary in attempting to resolve some basic issues concerning memory representation. For example, the use as retrieval cues of differing combinations of components produces differing patterns of recall, in differing quantities. How may these distributions be accounted for? Similarly, what are the effects upon memory of varying the attention paid to different components, or combinations of components? In dealing with such questions, it is useful to distinguish direct and indirect retrieval routes. This distinction can be shown to be of particular service in elucidating the relation that recall bears to the other major index of memory retention, recognition.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Domains of recollection.Psychological Review, 1982
- A General Learning Theory and its Application to Schema Abstraction1Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 1979
- Recognition failure and dual mechanisms in recall.Psychological Review, 1978
- Tests of a structural theory of the memory trace*British Journal of Psychology, 1978
- Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review, 1978
- A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976
- A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 1975
- Working MemoryPublished by Elsevier ,1974
- Two-phase model for prompted recall.Psychological Review, 1970
- Perception and communication.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958