Ground‐based optical observations of hydrogen emission in the auroral substorm
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 106 (A1) , 33-44
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2000ja002010
Abstract
A combination of all‐sky imagers (ASTV) and meridian‐scanning photometers (MSP) was used to identify the optical signature of the growth phase, onset, expansion, and recovery of 33 auroral substorms in the Alaskan sector. The discrete auroral arc that brightens at auroral substorm onset was found to be poleward of the diffuse aurora that contains the H emission by a distance of between 10 and 300 km. The average onset time was 2215 magnetic local time (MLT) and the average geographic latitude of the onset arc and the H arc was 64.6° and 63.6°, respectively. The poleward crossover of the peak H emission occurs shortly after substorm onset, for substorm intensification after 2100 MLT. The peak H emission crosses back to the equatorward position during substorm recovery between 2100 and 0100 MLT. After 0100 MLT the peak H emission remains poleward of the electron‐trapping boundary for the rest of the night. During the growth phase the peak H emission moves equatorward more quickly than does the onset arc and monotonically doubles in total intensity during the equatorward motion, in a manner quite unrelated to the fluctuations in brightness of the onset arc. In the onset arc a reduction of 427.8‐nm N2+ and 557.7‐nm [O I] emissions just prior to onset has been reported earlier and dubbed “auroral fading”. We find that the 630.0‐nm [O I] emission rises considerably relative to the others, and we conclude that the “fading” observed in the few minutes prior to onset is the ionospheric signature of a pulse of > 1010 electrons cm2s‐V−1 with energies less than 100 eV. Thus the observations reported here do not support the argument that the substorm onset begins from within the proton precipitation, but the discovery of the soft electron pulse during “auroral fading” just prior to onset does support those substorm onset theories requiring a pulse of Alfven speed electrons poleward of the electron trapping boundary and in the region of upward field‐aligned current.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emission of OI(630 nm) in proton auroraJournal of Geophysical Research, 2001
- Joint two-dimensional observations of ground magnetic and ionospheric electric fields associated with auroral zone currents: Current systems associated with local auroral break-upsPlanetary and Space Science, 1981
- Simultaneous observations of discrete and diffuse auroras by the Isis 2 satellite and airborne instrumentsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1976
- Dynamic relationship between proton and electron auroral substormsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1975
- Particle and auroral observations from the ESRO I/AURORAE satelliteJournal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 1973
- Comments on the growth phase of magnetospheric substormsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1972
- The spreading of a proton beam by the atmospherePlanetary and Space Science, 1972
- Auroral MorphologyPublished by Springer Nature ,1971
- Expected spatial distribution of low-energy protons precipitated in the auroral zonesJournal of Geophysical Research, 1965
- The development of the auroral substormPlanetary and Space Science, 1964