Development by design: blending landscape‐level planning with the mitigation hierarchy
Open Access
- 20 August 2009
- journal article
- concepts and-question
- Published by Wiley in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Vol. 8 (5) , 261-266
- https://doi.org/10.1890/090005
Abstract
Compensatory mitigation, or biodiversity offsets, provide a mechanism for maintaining or enhancing environmental values in situations where development is being planned, despite detrimental environmental impacts. Offsets are generally intended as an option for addressing any remaining environmental impacts of a development plan, after efforts have been made to avoid, minimize, or restore on‐site impacts. Although offset programs require that developers adhere to the mitigation hierarchy to avoid, minimize, and restore biodiversity on‐site before considering an offset for residual impacts, no quantitative guidelines exist for this decision‐making process. What criteria are needed to require that impacts be minimized or avoided altogether? Here, we examine how conservation planning can provide a way to address this issue. By blending landscape‐level conservation planning with application of the mitigation hierarchy, we can ensure that the use of biodiversity offsets is consistent with sustainable development practices.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Framework for Implementing Biodiversity Offsets: Selecting Sites and Determining ScaleBioScience, 2009
- Opportunism, Threats, and the Evolution of Systematic Conservation PlanningConservation Biology, 2008
- BioBanking: an environmental scientist’s view of the role of biodiversity banking offsets in conservationBiodiversity and Conservation, 2008
- Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog?Ecological Management & Restoration, 2007
- A Multicriteria Assessment of the Irreplaceability and Vulnerability of Sites in the Greater Yellowstone EcosystemConservation Biology, 2002
- The current biodiversity extinction event: Scenarios for mitigation and recoveryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinementPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reservesBiological Conservation, 1997
- Determining Minimum Habitat Requirements in Theory and PracticeOikos, 1996
- A Population Viability Analysis for African Elephant (Loxodonta africana): How Big Should Reserves Be?Conservation Biology, 1993