Detection of Differential Item Functioning Under the Graded Response Model With the Likelihood Ratio Test
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 22 (4) , 345-355
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169802200403
Abstract
Type I error rates of the likelihood ratio test for the detection of differential item functioning (DIF) were investigated using monte carlo simulations. The graded response model with five ordered categories was used to generate datasets of a 30-item test for samples of 300 and 1,000 simulated examinees. All DIF comparisons were simulated by randomly pairing two groups of examinees. Three different sample size combinations of reference and focal groups were simulated under two ability matching conditions. For each of the six combinations of sample sizes by ability matching conditions, 100 replications of DIF detection comparisons were simulated. Item parameter estimates and likelihood values were obtained by marginal maximum likelihood estimation using the computer program MULTILOG. Irpe I eryor rates of the likelihood ratio test statistics for all six combinations of sample sizes and ability matching conditions were within theoretically expected values at each of the nominal alpha levels considered.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Investigation of the Likelihood Ratio Test For Detection of Differential Item FunctioningApplied Psychological Measurement, 1996
- A Comparison of Lord's Chi-Square, Raju's Area Measures, and the Likelihood Ratio Test on Detection of Differential Item FunctioningApplied Measurement in Education, 1995
- Detection of Differential Item Functioning in the Graded Response ModelApplied Psychological Measurement, 1993
- Effects of Linking Methods on Detection of DIFJournal of Educational Measurement, 1992
- Equating Tests Under the Graded Response ModelApplied Psychological Measurement, 1992
- Parameter Recovery in the Graded Response Model Using MULTILOGJournal of Educational Measurement, 1990
- Determining the Significance of Estimated Signed and Unsigned Areas Between Two Item Response FunctionsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1990
- The Area between Two Item Characteristic CurvesPsychometrika, 1988
- Estimation of Latent Group EffectsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1985
- Accounting for Statistical Artifacts in Item Bias ResearchJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984