Boredom Proneness and Psychosocial Development
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 133 (3) , 303-314
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599743
Abstract
The effect of boredom proneness as measured by the Boredom Proneness Scale (R. F. Farmer & N. D. Sundberg, 1986) on college students' psychosocial development was investigated via the Student Developmental Task and Lifestyle Assessment (SDTLA; R. B. Winston, T. K. Miller, & J. S. Prince, 1995). Low boredom-prone students had significantly higher scores on the following SDTLA measures: career planning, lifestyle planning, peer relationships, educational involvement, instrumental autonomy, emotional autonomy, interdependence, academic autonomy, and salubrious lifestyle. Gender differences on boredom proneness and psychosocial development measures are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retrospective and prospective design and dataEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1996
- Tackling Truancy: an examination of persistent non‐attendance amongst disaffected school pupils and positive support strategiesCambridge Journal of Education, 1995
- Boredom proneness: Temperamental and cognitive componentsPersonality and Individual Differences, 1993
- Boredom in the Middle School Years: Blaming Schools versus Blaming StudentsAmerican Journal of Education, 1991
- BOREDOM PRONENESS IN PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLINGPsychological Reports, 1990
- Emotion and eating in obesity: A review of the literatureInternational Journal of Eating Disorders, 1989
- Boredom Proneness--The Development and Correlates of a New ScaleJournal of Personality Assessment, 1986
- INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN BOREDOM PRONENESS AND TASK EFFECTIVENESS AT WORKPersonnel Psychology, 1982
- General Satisfaction and Boredom at School as a Function of the Pupils’ Personality CharacteristicsScandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1977
- A FIELD STUDY OF REPETITIVE MANUAL WORK IN RELATION TO ACCIDENTS AT THE WORK PLACEInternational Journal of Production Research, 1970