Locke, Revolution Principles, and the Formation of Whig Ideology
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Historical Journal
- Vol. 26 (4) , 773-800
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00012693
Abstract
In the immediate aftermath of the Glorious Revolution, there appeared an anonymous pamphlet, Political aphorisms, which purported to instruct its readers in ‘true maxims of government’. The identity of the author of this bold doctrinal claim is not known, and while it would be useful to have this knowledge, it is not, for reasons which will become clear, the most crucial element of the story. What is important is the historical significance of the role played by Political aphorisms as part of the process by which the ‘revolution principles’ of 1689 gained widespread acceptance in eighteenth-century England. In this essay, we offer one concrete illustration of the complex process by which political ideas are transmitted from one generation to another; and, we shall argue, the example provides a case study of the conscious effort to formulate an ideological defence of specific political principles and practices in order to preserve the historical meaning of a partisan perspective.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reception and Influence: A Reply to Nelson on Locke's ‘Two Treatises of Government’Political Studies, 1980
- John Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty: Mixed Monarchy and the Right of Resistance in the Political Thought of the English RevolutionThe American Historical Review, 1979
- The Letters of JuniusThe American Historical Review, 1979
- The Tory Crisis in Church and State, 1688-1730: The Career of Francis Atterbury, Bishop of RochesterThe American Historical Review, 1977
- Revolution PrinciplesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1977
- Patriarchalism in Political ThoughtThe Western Political Quarterly, 1976
- The Trial of Doctor SacheverellThe American Historical Review, 1974
- A Defence of Liberty against Tyrants.The Philosophical Review, 1925