A Chain Multinomial Model for Estimating the Real-Time Fatality Rate of a Disease, with an Application to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Open Access
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 161 (7) , 700-706
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi088
Abstract
It is well known that statistics using cumulative data are insensitive to changes. World Health Organization (WHO) estimates of fatality rates are of the above type, which may not be able to reflect the latest changes in fatality due to treatment or government policy in a timely fashion. Here, the authors propose an estimate of a real-time fatality rate based on a chain multinomial model with a kernel function. It is more accurate than the WHO estimate in describing fatality, especially earlier in the course of an epidemic. The estimator provides useful information for public health policy makers for understanding the severity of the disease or evaluating the effects of treatments or policies within a shorter time period, which is critical in disease control during an outbreak. Simulation results showed that the performance of the proposed estimator is superior to that of the WHO estimator in terms of its sensitivity to changes and its timeliness in reflecting the severity of the disease.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Men Have a Higher Case Fatality Rate of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome than Women Do?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Management of Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Clinical Features and Short-term Outcomes of 144 Patients With SARS in the Greater Toronto AreaJAMA, 2003
- Glycyrrhizin, an active component of liquorice roots, and replication of SARS-associated coronavirusThe Lancet, 2003
- Managing SARS amidst UncertaintyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- A Major Outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in Hong KongNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Critics slam treatment for SARS as ineffective and perhaps dangerousNature, 2003