Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing General with Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Preeclamptic Patients with a Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Trace
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 99 (3) , 561-569
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200309000-00010
Abstract
Background: There are no randomized studies on neonatal outcome after spinal versus general anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. This study examined both markers of neonatal hypoxia and maternal hemodynamics. Methods: Seventy patients were randomized to general (n = 35) or spinal anesthesia (n = 35). The general anesthesia group received thiopentone, magnesium sulfate, and suxamethonium intravenously before intubation, followed by 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, 0.75-1.5% isoflurane, and morphine after delivery. The target end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco2) was 30-34 mmHg. The spinal anesthesia group received 1.8 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 10 microg fentanyl at the L3-L4 interspace. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured at specific time points. Hypotension was treated with ephedrine. Maternal arterial and neonatal umbilical arterial blood gas samples were taken at delivery. Resuscitation requirements were recorded. Results: In both groups, hemodynamic measures remained within acceptable limits. Spinal anesthesia patients required more ephedrine (13.7 vs. 2.7 mg). Maternal Paco2 was lower in the spinal group (28.9 vs. 32.4 mmHg). One-minute Apgar scores were lower after general anesthesia. Base deficit was greater (7.13 vs. 4.68 mEq/l) and neonatal umbilical arterial pH was lower (7.20 vs. 7.23) after spinal anesthesia. Post hoc analysis showed that if maternal diastolic blood pressure on admission was greater than 110 mmHg, neonatal umbilical arterial base deficit was greater after spinal anesthesia. There was no difference in the number of patients with Apgar scores less than 7 at 1 or 5 min or umbilical arterial pH less than 7.2 or in the requirements for resuscitation. Conclusions: In preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace, spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery was associated with a greater mean neonatal umbilical arterial base deficit and a lower median umbilical arterial pH. The clinical significance remains to be established. Maternal hemodynamics were similar and acceptable with either anesthetic technique.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spinal versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Severely Preeclamptic PatientsAnesthesiology, 1999
- Spinal Anesthesia in Severely Preeclamptic WomenAnesthesiology, 1999
- Regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia: spinal anaesthesia is the preferred choiceInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1999
- Spinal anaesthesia in severe preeclampsia: time for reappraisal, or time for caution?International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 1998
- Higher rate of fetal acidemia after regional anesthesia for elective cesarean deliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- The value of a scoring system for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomeActa Paediatrica, 1997
- Failed intubation revisited: 17-yr experience in a teaching maternity unitBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1996
- Randomized Comparison of General and Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Pregnancies Complicated by Severe PreeclampsiaObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Anesthesia for caesarean section and immediate neonatal outcomeIndian Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- A Reevaluation of the Role of Crystalloid Preload in the Prevention of Hypotension Associated with Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean SectionAnesthesiology, 1993