Cannabinoids for control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic
Top Cited Papers
- 7 July 2001
- Vol. 323 (7303) , 16
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7303.16
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the antiemetic efficacy and adverse effects of cannabis used for sickness induced by chemotherapy. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: Systematic search (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, bibliographies), any language, to August 2000. Studies: 30 randomised comparisons of cannabis with placebo or antiemetics from which dichotomous data on efficacy and harm were available (1366 patients). Oral nabilone, oral dronabinol (tetrahydrocannabinol), and intramuscular levonantradol were tested. No cannabis was smoked. Follow up lasted 24 hours. Results: Cannabinoids were more effective antiemetics than prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, chlorpromazine, thiethylperazine, haloperidol, domperidone, or alizapride: relative risk 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.62), number needed to treat 6 for complete control of nausea; 1.28 (1.08 to 1.51), NNT 8 for complete control of vomiting. Cannabinoids were not more effective in patients receiving very low or very high emetogenic chemotherapy. In crossover trials, patients preferred cannabinoids for future chemotherapy cycles: 2.39 (2.05 to 2.78), NNT 3. Some potentially beneficial side effects occurred more often with cannabinoids: “high” 10.6 (6.86 to 16.5), NNT 3; sedation or drowsiness 1.66 (1.46 to 1.89), NNT 5; euphoria 12.5 (3.00 to 52.1), NNT 7. Harmful side effects also occurred more often with cannabinoids: dizziness 2.97 (2.31 to 3.83), NNT 3; dysphoria or depression 8.06 (3.38 to 19.2), NNT 8; hallucinations 6.10 (2.41 to 15.4), NNT 17; paranoia 8.58 (6.38 to 11.5), NNT 20; and arterial hypotension 2.23 (1.75 to 2.83), NNT 7. Patients given cannabinoids were more likely to withdraw due to side effects 4.67 (3.07 to 7.09), NNT 11. Conclusions: In selected patients, the cannabinoids tested in these trials may be useful as mood enhancing adjuvants for controlling chemotherapy related sickness. Potentially serious adverse effects, even when taken short term orally or intramuscularly, are likely to limit their widespread use. What is already known on this topic Requests have been made for legalisation of cannabis (marijuana) for medical use Long term smoking of cannabis can have physical and neuropsychiatric adverse effects Cannabis may be useful in the control of chemotherapy related sickness What this study adds Oral nabilone and dronabinol and intramuscular levonantradol are superior to conventional antiemetics (such as prochlorperazine or metoclopramide) in chemotherapy Side effects are common with cannabinoids, and although some may be potentially beneficial (euphoria, “high,” sedation), others are harmful (dysphoria, depression, hallucinations) Many patients have a strong preference for cannabinoidsKeywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Dronabinol as a treatment for anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDSJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1995
- Dose Ranging Evaluation of the Antiemetic Efficacy and Toxicity of Intramuscular Levonantradol in Cancer Subjects with Chemotherapy-Induced EmesisThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1984
- Antiemetic Effect of Δ9‐Tetrahydrocannabinol in Chemotherapy‐Associated Nausea and Emesis As Compared to Placebo and CompazineThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Comparative Trial of the Antiemetic Effects of THC and HaloperidolThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- The Controlled Substances Therapeutic Research Act in the State of WashingtonThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Physiologic Observations in a Controlled Clinical Trial of the Antiemetic Effectiveness of 5, 10, and 15 mg of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Cancer Chemotherapy. Ophthalmologic ImplicationsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Nabilone: An Effective Antiemetic in Patients Receiving Cancer ChemotherapyThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Antiemetics in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Superiority of Nabilone over Prochlorperazine as an Antiemetic in Patients Receiving Cancer ChemotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979