Costs of an Emergency Department—Based Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol vs Hospitalization in Patients With Chest Pain
- 26 November 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 278 (20) , 1670-1676
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550200046030
Abstract
Context. —More than 3 million patients are hospitalized yearly in the United States for chest pain. The cost is over $3 billion just for those found to be free of acute disease. New rapid diagnostic tests for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have resulted in the proliferation of accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) and chest pain observation units. Objective. —To determine whether use of an emergency department (ED)—based ADP can reduce hospital admission rate, total cost, and length of stay (LOS) for patients needing admission for evaluation of chest pain. Design. —Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing admission rate, total cost, and LOS for patients treated using ADP vs inpatient controls. Total costs were determined using empirically measured resource utilization and microcosting techniques. Setting. —A large urban public teaching hospital serving a predominantly African American and Hispanic population. Patients. —A sample of 165 patients was randomly selected from a larger consecutive sample of 429 patients with chest pain concurrently enrolled in an ADP diagnostic cohort trial. Eligible patients presented to the ED with clinical findings suggestive of AMI or acute cardiac ischemia (ACI) but at low risk using a validated predictive algorithm. Main Outcome Measures. —Primary outcomes measured for each subject were LOS and total cost of treatment. Results. —The hospital admission rate for ADP vs control patients was 45.2% vs 100% (P<.001). The mean total cost per patient for ADP vs control patients was $1528 vs $2095 (P<.001). The mean LOS measured in hours for ADP vs control patients was 33.1 hours vs 44.8 hours (P<.01). Conclusions. —In this trial, ADP saved $567 in total hospital costs per patient treated. Use of ED-based ADPs can reduce hospitalization rates, LOS, and total cost for low-risk patients with chest pain needing evaluation for possible AMI or ACI.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: Results of a randomized study (ROMIO)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- The Costs of Visits to Emergency DepartmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Chest Pain Emergency Department and the Outpatient Chest Pain Evaluation Center: Revolution or Evolution?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Earlier diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction necessitates the need for a 'new diagnostic mind-set'.Circulation, 1994
- Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: Results from a multicenter studyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarctionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- How many myocardial infarctions should we rule out?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Long‐Term morbidity in patients where the initial suspicion of myocardial infarction was not confirmedClinical Cardiology, 1988
- The Significance of ST and T Changes for the Development of Coronary Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Chest Pain, Treated in a Coronary Care Unit without Verified Acute Myocardial InfarctionActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985
- Length-of-Stay Variations Within ICDA-8 Diagnosis-Related GroupsMedical Care, 1984