Macropartisanship: An Empirical Reassessment
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 85 (1) , 181-192
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1962884
Abstract
To evaluate the comparability of the Gallup and Michigan Survey Research Center measures for studying levels of partisanship among the U.S. electorate we compare the overtime distribution of partisanship and the correlates of partisanship using the results of Gallup surveys, the National Election Studies, and the General Social Surveys. Compared with the Gallup results, both the other two surveys reveal less short-term variation and also less total variation. Compared with the Gallup results, the National Election Studies partisanship results are less related to short-term electoral outcomes and do not appear to be strongly driven by short-term economic and political evaluations. Our analyses suggest that scholars should be cautious about using Gallup results to revise conclusions based upon analyses that employ the Michigan Survey Research Center party identification measure.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- MacropartisanshipAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- Change in Party IdentificationAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1989
- Measuring Change in Party Identification in an Election CampaignAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential ElectionBritish Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Why the Democrat-Republican Partisanship Gap Varies From Poll to PollPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1987
- The Partisan Affinities of Independent ‘Leaners’British Journal of Political Science, 1986
- Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential PopularityAmerican Political Science Review, 1985