New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest
Open Access
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 28 (5) , 318-321
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.5.318
Abstract
This paper examines the UK’s response to a recent European Clinical Trials Directive, namely the Department of Health, Central Office for Research Ethics Committee guidance, Governance Arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees. The revisions have been long awaited by researchers and research ethics committee members alike. They substantially reform the ethical review system in the UK. We examine the new arrangements and argue that though they go a long way toward addressing the uncertainty surrounding ethics committee function, the system favours the facilitation of research over the protection of the dignity and welfare of research participants.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease?BMJ, 2000
- The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective studyBMJ, 2000
- Ethical ethics committees?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2000
- Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountabilityBMJ, 1996
- Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards?BMJ, 1995
- Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committeesBMJ, 1995
- The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1995
- Why do research ethics committees disagree with each other?1995
- Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol.1994
- Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees.BMJ, 1989