Evaluation of Nucleoside Phosphonates and Their Analogs and Prodrugs for Inhibition of Orthopoxvirus Replication

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In the event of a bioterrorism attack using smallpox virus, there currently is no approved drug for the treatment of infections with this virus. We have reported previously that (S)-1-[3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]cytosine (HPMPC) (also known as cidofovir [CDV]) has good activity against poxvirus infections; however, a major limitation is the requirement for intravenous administration. Two related acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (ANPs), adefovir (PMEA) and tenofovir (PMPA), are active against human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B virus but do not have activity against the orthopoxviruses. Therefore, we have evaluated a number of analogs and potential oral prodrugs of these three compounds for their ability to inhibit the replication of vaccinia virus or cowpox virus in tissue culture cells. The most-active compounds within the CDV series were (S)-HPMPA and (butyl l-alaninyl) cyclic HPMPC, with 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) from 4 to 8 μM, compared with 33 to 43 μM for CDV. Although PMEA itself was not active, adefovir dipivoxil {bis[(pivaloyl)oxymethyl] PMEA} and bis(butyl l-alaninyl) PMEA were active against both viruses, and bis(butyl l-alaninyl) PME-N6-(cyclopropyl)DAP and (isopropyl l-alaninyl)phenyl PME-N6-(cyclopropyl)DAP were the most active compounds tested, with EC50s of 0.1 to 2.6 μM. In the PMPA series, none of the analogs tested had significantly better activity than PMPA itself. These data indicate that a number of these ANP derivatives have activity against vaccinia virus and cowpox virus in vitro and should be evaluated for their efficacies in animal models.