Preconditions for Sensitivity in Measuring Change: Visual Analogue Scales Compared to Rating Scales in a Likert Format
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 77 (2) , 475-480
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.475
Abstract
In a study of preconditions of responsiveness, we examined the variances obtained by two different ways of responding to questionnaire items. Subjects were 168 first-year medical students. They all completed a questionnaire of nine items. The original Liken-like scoring was (partially) replaced by visual analogue scoring in three quarters of the questionnaires. For three items the analogue form had a significantly greater variance than the discrete form, but no discrete item had a significantly greater variance than its analogue counterpart. Assuming that a greater variance was indicative for a greater responsiveness, our findings provide some support for the preferred use of analogue scales over discrete response categories in the measurement of changes over time.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarificationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Three Visual-Analogue Mood ScalesPsychological Reports, 1986
- Graphic representation of painPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1976
- A Growing Edge of Measurement of Feelings [Abridged]Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1969