Understanding controlled trials: What outcomes should be measured?
- 17 October 1998
- Vol. 317 (7165) , 1075-1080
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1075
Abstract
Many types of clinical, patient related, and economic outcomes can be measured in trials. The choice of one or more outcomes will depend on the nature of the study and the question it is trying to answer. Objectives can relate to different levels of observation and analysis,from the individual to the family, the community, and society as a whole. If a trial is “explanatory”1then a single main measure of clinical outcome may be appropriate. For example, if a trial is designed to determine which of two antihypertensive agents is more effective at lowering blood pressure then hypertensive control will be the main outcome. Traditionally, clinical trials have used physiological or biomedical outcomes, but these may not be well related …Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economics Notes: Measuring outcomes in economic evaluationsBMJ, 1999
- Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials?BMJ, 1998
- Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal DisordersSpine, 1997
- Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. II: the outcome of careBMJ, 1997
- Comparison of out of hours care provided by patients' own general practitioners and commercial deputising services: a randomised controlled trial. I: The process of careBMJ, 1997
- Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Problems Reported by Relatives in a Community Study of DementiaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1990