Ultrasonography versus Intravenous Urography In the Evaluation of Patients with Microscopic Haematuria
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 66 (2) , 144-147
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14891.x
Abstract
Urography and transabdominal ultrasonography of the urinary tract were compared in 193 patients with microhaematuria. Of 16 expansile lesions described at urography, 1 renal carcinoma was detected by both methods. Although the number of patients studied is too small for firm conclusions to be drawn, ultrasonography seems to offer advantages when compared with urography.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Renal Carcinomas Missed by UrographyBritish Journal of Urology, 1989
- Examination TechniquesPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Renal StonesScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1987
- Asymptomatic Microhematuria and Urologic DiseasePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1986
- Normal excretory urography in patients with primary kidney neoplasmsUrologic Radiology, 1985
- Ultrasonic assessment of hydronephrosis of pregnancy.Radiology, 1983
- Mortality during excretory urography: Mayo Clinic experienceAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1982
- Clinical importance of microhematuriaPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1979
- Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstructionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1978