Suboptimal Monitoring and Dosing of Unfractionated Heparin in Comparative Studies with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin
- 6 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 138 (9) , 720-723
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00008
Abstract
Site-specific validation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) therapeutic range is required to ensure administration of the optimal dose of unfractionated heparin. Therapeutic ranges of 1.5 to 2.5 times the control value are subtherapeutic for most modern aPTT reagents. To audit the appropriateness of aPTT monitoring in clinical trials comparing unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with venous thromboembolism. Search of PubMed database from 1984 to 2001. Randomized, controlled trials that compared unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Use of unvalidated and potentially suboptimal therapeutic ranges for aPTT in patients assigned to receive unfractionated heparin. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. Only 3 studies used a validated aPTT therapeutic range, and 11 studies used a range that included aPTT values 1.5 times the control value. Ten studies reported unfractionated heparin doses, and 7 of these documented a reduction to less than 30 000 U/d in response to aPTT results. Most studies monitored unfractionated heparin inappropriately. This shortcoming could be responsible for the reduced efficacy of unfractionated heparin in clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin on Thrombus Regression and Recurrent Thromboembolism in Patients with Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Use of a Fixed Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Ratio to Establish a Therapeutic Range for Unfractionated HeparinArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Once or Twice Daily Compared with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseChest, 2001
- Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, Administered Primarily at Home, with Unfractionated Heparin, Administered in Hospital, and Subcutaneous Heparin, Administered at Home for Deep-Vein ThrombosisAngiology, 1999
- A multicentre comparison of once‐daily subcutaneous dalteparin (low molecular weight heparin) and continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosisJournal of Internal Medicine, 1996
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered Primarily at Home with Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital for Proximal Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Establishing a Therapeutic Range for Heparin TherapyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Compared with Continuous Intravenous Heparin in the Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep-vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1992