Prevalence of Diabetes and High Risk for Diabetes Using A1C Criteria in the U.S. Population in 1988–2006
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 19 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 33 (3) , 562-568
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1524
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined prevalences of previously diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes and high risk for diabetes using recently suggested A1C criteria in the U.S. during 2003–2006. We compared these prevalences to those in earlier surveys and those using glucose criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2003–2006, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included a probability sample of 14,611 individuals aged ≥12 years. Participants were classified on glycemic status by interview for diagnosed diabetes and by A1C, fasting, and 2-h glucose challenge values measured in subsamples. RESULTS: Using A1C criteria, the crude prevalence of total diabetes in adults aged ≥20 years was 9.6% (20.4 million), of which 19.0% was undiagnosed (7.8% diagnosed, 1.8% undiagnosed using A1C ≥6.5%). Another 3.5% of adults (7.4 million) were at high risk for diabetes (A1C 6.0 to <6.5%). Prevalences were disproportionately high in the elderly. Age-/sex-standardized prevalence was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans versus non-Hispanic whites for diagnosed, undiagnosed, and total diabetes (P < 0.003); standardized prevalence at high risk for diabetes was more than two times higher in non-Hispanic blacks versus non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans (P < 0.00001). Since 1988–1994, diagnosed diabetes generally increased, while the percent of diabetes that was undiagnosed and the percent at high risk of diabetes generally decreased. Using A1C criteria, prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and high risk of diabetes were one-third that and one-tenth that, respectively, using glucose criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although A1C detects much lower prevalences than glucose criteria, hyperglycemic conditions remain high in the U.S., and elderly and minority groups are disproportionately affected.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Expert Committee Report on the Role of the A1C Assay in the Diagnosis of DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2009
- HbA1c: how do we measure it and what does it mean?Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, 2009
- Full Accounting of Diabetes and Pre-Diabetes in the U.S. Population in 1988–1994 and 2005–2006Diabetes Care, 2009
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009Diabetes Care, 2009
- Effect of Aging on A1C Levels in Individuals Without DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2008
- Differences in A1C by Race and Ethnicity Among Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention ProgramDiabetes Care, 2007
- Short-term Variability in Measures of Glycemia and Implications for the Classification of DiabetesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with Lifestyle Intervention or MetforminNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Innovative strategies using SUDAAN for analysis of health surveys with complex samplesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1996
- Interlaboratory Standardization of Measurements of GlycohemoglobinsClinical Chemistry, 1992