Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract
Background— Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve symptoms compared with conservative medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD); however, there is limited evidence on the effect of PCI on the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and subsequent revascularization. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials comparing PCI to conservative treatment in patients with stable CAD.

This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit: