Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? a meta-analysis of intra-institutional results

This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:

• “Our complication rates are lower than theirs”: Statistical critique of heart valve comparisons
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
• Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of 25 years of experience at a single center
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
• Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approach
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002
• Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for Reporting
  JAMA, 2000
• Tricuspid valve replacement: results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses.
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2000
• Prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve: biological or mechanical?
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
• Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints
  Statistics in Medicine, 1998
• Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
• Tricuspid valve replacement: Postoperative and long-term results
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995
• The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experience
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1995