Self protection in surgery: The use of double gloves
- 1 February 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 77 (2) , 219-220
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770228
Abstract
This study assesses the perforation rate of single and double gloves and thus the extent to which double gloving protects the surgeon from diseases transmissible from the patient. We have also investigated whether double gloving offers the patient extra protection by reducing wound sepsis. Two hundred adult hernia repairs were performed, the first 100 single gloved and the second 100 double gloved. Glove perforation rates were not significantly different between single gloves and the outer of the double gloves. Although 46 of 400 outer gloves were perforated there were only 15 inner glove perforations and only eight of these matched the outer perforations. The percentage of operations in which the latex protective barrier was breached was reduced from 31 per cent when the surgeon wore single gloves to 8 per cent with double gloves. Wound sepsis was not increased by glove perforation nor reduced by double gloving. While careful technique remains mandatory we conclude that double gloving offers increased protection to the surgeon operating on high risk infectious cases.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgical glove perforationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- Surgical glove perforationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Does wearing two pairs of gloves protect operating theatre staff from skin contamination?BMJ, 1988
- Surgical gloves as a mechanical barrier against human immunodeficiency virusesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988