Genetic effects on the biomass partitioning and growth ofPisumandLycopersicon
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Botany
- Vol. 95 (4) , 424-433
- https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.95.4.424
Abstract
We examined a series of eight pea genotypes differing in three naturally occurring allelic mutations, i.e., af (afila), st (stipules reduced), and tl (tendril-less) and three species, five cultivars, and one interspecific hybrid of tomato differing in SP (SELF-PRUNING) allele composition to determine whether different phenotypes ontogenetically express different biomass partitioning patterns compared to the isometric partitioning pattern and an interspecific 3/4 scaling “rule” governing annual growth with respect to body mass. The slopes and “elevations” (i.e., α and log β, respectively) of log-log linear regression curves of bivariate plots of leaf, stem, and root dry mass and of annual growth vs. total body mass were used to assess pattern homogeneity. The annual growth of all pea and tomato phenotypes complied with the 3/4 growth rule. The biomass partitioning patterns of all tomato phenotypes were statistically indistinguishable from the isometric pattern as were those of the pea wild type and three single-mutant genotypes. However, significant departures from the isometric (and pea wild type) biomass allocation pattern were observed for three genotypes, all of which were homozygous for the af allele. These results open the door to explore the heritability and genetics underlying the allometry of biomass partitioning patterns and growth.Keywords
Funding Information
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hormone Interactions and Regulation of Unifoliata, PsPK2, PsPIN1 and LE Gene Expression in Pea ( Pisum sativum ) Shoot TipsPlant and Cell Physiology, 2006
- Genetic mapping of allometric scaling lawsGenetics Research, 2006
- A phyletic perspective on the allometry of plant biomass‐partitioning patterns and functionally equivalent organ‐categoriesNew Phytologist, 2006
- Functional mapping — how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traitsNature Reviews Genetics, 2006
- Roles of Auxin andUniin Leaf Morphogenesis of theafilaGenotype of Pea (Pisum sativum)International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2004
- Roles of theUniGene in Shoot and Leaf Development of Pea (Pisum sativum): Phenotypic Characterization and Leaf Development in theunianduni‐tacMutantsInternational Journal of Plant Sciences, 2001
- Roles of the Af and Tl genes in pea leaf morphogenesis: leaf morphology and pinna anatomy of the heterozygotesCanadian Journal of Botany, 1999
- The Control of Pinna Morphology in Wildtype and Mutant Leaves of the Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.)International Journal of Plant Sciences, 1996
- Comparisons Among Biomass Allocation and Spatial Distribution Patterns of Some Vine, Pteridophyte, and Gymnosperm ShootsAmerican Journal of Botany, 1994
- THE GENETIC BASIS OF ORGANIC FORMAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1958