Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index
Top Cited Papers
- 20 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 112 (6) , 768-772
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x
Abstract
Objective To show the increased risk of adverse outcomes in labour and fetomaternal morbidity in obese women (BMI > 30).Design A population‐based observational study.Setting University Hospital of Wales. The study sample was drawn from the Cardiff Births Survey, a population‐based database comprising of a total of 60,167 deliveries in the South Glamorgan area between 1990 and 1999.Population Primigravid women with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy with cephalic presentation of 37 or more weeks of gestation with accurate information regarding height and weight recorded at the booking visit (measured by the midwives) were included in the study.Methods Comparisons were made between women with a body mass index of 20–30 and those with more than 30. SPSS version 10 was used for statistical analysis. Student's t test, χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used wherever appropriate.Main outcome measures Labour outcomes assessed were risk of postdates, induction of labour, mode of delivery, failed instrumental delivery, macrosomia and shoulder dystocia. Maternal adverse outcomes assessed were postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, uterine and wound infection, urinary tract infection, evacuation of uterus, thromboembolism and third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal tears. Fetal wellbeing was assessed using Apgar Results We report an increased risk [quoted as odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals CI)] of postdates, 1.4 (1.2–1.7); induction of labour, 1.6 (1.3–1.9); caesarean section, 1.6 (1.4–2); macrosomia, 2.1 (1.6–2.6); shoulder dystocia, 2.9 (1.4–5.8); failed instrumental delivery, 1.75 (1.1–2.9); increased maternal complications such as blood loss of more than 500 mL, 1.5 (1.2–1.8); urinary tract infections, 1.9 (1.1–3.4); and increased neonatal admissions with complications such as neonatal trauma, feeding difficulties and incubator requirement.Conclusion Obese women appear to be at risk of intrapartum and postpartum complications. Induction of labour appears to be the starting point in the cascade of events. They should be considered as high risk and counselled accordingly.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maternal Morbid Obesity and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy OutcomeObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban centerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- The effect of the increasing prevalence of maternal obesity on perinatal morbidityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
- Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287 213 pregnancies in LondonInternational Journal of Obesity, 2001
- Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk populationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Factors associated with obesity in South Asian, Afro-Caribbean and European womenInternational Journal of Obesity, 1999
- Perinatal outcome in pregnancy complicated by massive obesityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992
- The clinical utility of maternal body mass index in pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- The Importance of Obesity in the Development of Coronary Risk Factors and Disease: The Epidemiologic EvidenceAnnual Review of Public Health, 1986
- The Importance of Obesity in the Development of Coronary Risk Factors and Disease: The Epidemiologic EvidenceAnnual Review of Public Health, 1986