Toward a Reconciliation of the Bureaucratic and Democratic Ethos
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 30 (1) , 85-109
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979803000106
Abstract
This article attempts to reconcile the dominant ethical frameworks in public administration: the bureaucratic ethos and the democratic ethos. To do so, the article begins by recasting the debate between the two ethos as a modern-day manifestation of the historic and ongoing debate between utilitarian and deontological ethics. It next shows how the principle of the universalizability of ethical rules can be derived from both utilitarian and deontological theory. Finally, it shows how the principle of universalizability can be used to reconcile the two ethos in the context of the public interest.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Administration Ethics and Judgments of Utility: Reconciling the Competing TheoriesThe American Review of Public Administration, 1996
- The Moral SenseAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- Between Citizen and Administrator: Administrative Ethics and PARPublic Administration Review, 1990
- Free to choose, free to win, free to lose: the phenomenology of ethical spaceInternational Journal of Public Administration, 1989
- Leadership Failures, the Distrusting Public, and Prospects of the Administrative StatePublic Administration Review, 1987
- Hierarchy, Virtue, and the Practice of Public Administration: A Perspective for Normative EthicsPublic Administration Review, 1987
- A Janus-Headed Model of Ethical Theory: Looking Two Ways at Business/Society IssuesAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- Materialism and HumanismAdministration & Society, 1978
- Social Equity, Justice, and the Equitable AdministratorPublic Administration Review, 1974
- Administrative Policy Formulation and the Public InterestPublic Administration Review, 1969