Abstract
The paper examines the effects and significance of geographic position, cumulative advantages and disadvantages of past development, present investment cuts, political factors and links, and two recent decrees on enterprises, regional self-management, and the devolution of authority in selected Slavic regions. It argues that structural and spatial constraints and system-preserving controls on the reforms themselves have rendered perestroyka ineffectual and accentuated “center-periphery” tensions within the Slavic republics, Journal of Economic Literature, Classification Numbers: 052, 124, 940.