Effects of Differential Genotyping Error Rate on the Type I Error Probability of Case-Control Studies
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Human Heredity
- Vol. 61 (1) , 55-64
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000092553
Abstract
Objectives: It is well known that genotyping error adversely affects the power of genetic case-control association studies but there is little research on its effects on type I error, and none that has addressed possible differences in genotype error rates between cases and controls. Methods: We used simulations to examine the influence of genotyping error on the type I error probability given by case-control studies. The effect of genotyping error on the magnitude of type I error was explored for a single marker of varying minor allele frequency (MAF), and for haplotypic tests based on two markers with varying MAF and linkage disequilibrium (LD) measure r2. Results: We show that even with low genotyping error rates (Conclusions: Our results show that small differential genotyping error rates between cases and controls pose significant problems for association analyses. Differential genotyping error rates are particularly likely to arise where genotype data are combined from multiple sites, or where case genotypes are examined against archived reference population cohort genotypes that are being generated in several countries. Although these strategies may be necessary to obtain adequately powered samples, our data show the importance of stringent quality control. Furthermore, associations based on rare haplotypes should be treated with caution.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, case-control association studyNature Genetics, 2005
- Whole-Genome Patterns of Common DNA Variation in Three Human PopulationsScience, 2005
- Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concernsNature Reviews Genetics, 2005
- Use of unphased multilocus genotype data in indirect association studiesGenetic Epidemiology, 2004
- Impact of Genotyping Errors on Type I Error Rate of the Haplotype-Sharing Transmission/Disequilibrium Test (HS-TDT)American Journal of Human Genetics, 2004
- What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?Genetic Epidemiology, 2004
- Quantifying the Percent Increase in Minimum Sample Size for SNP Genotyping Errors in Genetic Model-Based Association StudiesHuman Heredity, 2004
- Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypesGenetic Epidemiology, 2003
- The impact of genotyping error on haplotype reconstruction and frequency estimationEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2002
- Cheap, accurate and rapid allele frequency estimation of single nucleotide polymorphisms by primer extension and DHPLC in DNA poolsHuman Genetics, 2000