Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy
- 31 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 187 (5) , 604-608
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trialJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2003
- Extended Transthoracic Resection Compared with Limited Transhiatal Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the EsophagusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Prospective Trial of a Blood Supply-Based Technique of Pancreaticojejunostomy: Effect on Anastomotic Failure in the Whipple Procedure1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Early Complications After Ivor Lewis Subtotal Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy: Risk Factors and ManagementJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancerJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Should En Bloc Esophagectomy Be the Standard of Care for Esophageal Carcinoma?Annals of Surgery, 2001
- Results of Duct-To-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Billroth I Type Reconstruction in 100 Consecutive PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Stented Versus Nonstented Pancreaticojejunostomy After PancreatoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Six Hundred Fifty Consecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990sAnnals of Surgery, 1997