The Politics of Childbirth: The Re-Emergence of Midwifery in Arizona
Open Access
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 33 (3) , 163-175
- https://doi.org/10.2307/800702
Abstract
Interviews with 27 licensed lay midwives in Arizona demonstrate the continuing macro- and micro-political struggles over definitions and control of childbirth. Physicians define childbirth as a potentially pathological process requiring active medical intervention. They also continue to regard lay midwives as dangerously unqualified and home birth as unnecessarily risky despite state licensure of midwives who attend home births. On the other hand, midwives define childbirth as a safe, normal process in most cases, and see physician opposition as self-serving and misinformed. They also stress the advantages of their holistic, family-centered care. Although state licensure gives lay midwives some protection from legal risks, physicians' continuing dominance in the health care arena has powerful, adverse consequences for both midwives and their clients.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Licensed lay midwifery and the medical model of childbirthSociology of Health & Illness, 1985
- IntroductionJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1984
- The Politics of Co‐optation: Strategies for Childbirth EducatorsBirth, 1983
- The birth controllers:: Limitations on Out-of-Hospital BirthsJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1982
- Evaluation of Outcomes of Non-Nurse MidwivesWomen & Health, 1981
- Physician Attitudes Toward Physician ExtendersMedical Care, 1979
- Conflicting Interpretations of ChildbirthUrban Life, 1979
- OBSTETRIC DELIVERY TODAY: For Better or for Worse?The Lancet, 1976
- Selective induction of labour.BMJ, 1975