Analyzing Consensus to Personality Judgments: A Variance Components Approach
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Personality
- Vol. 61 (4) , 769-788
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00790.x
Abstract
Although peer raters of personality traits do tend to agree, the strength of their consensus is often modest. This article focuses on methods for analyzing determinants of consensus. Variance components methods adapted from generalizability theory have some untapped potential for understanding gradations in consensus. The methods allow explicit analysis of how social categories of targets might affect judgments of raters from the same or different social categories. Limitations of the variance components approach are also discussed. The methods are illustrated with artificial data.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 1991
- A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 1991
- Interrater reliability coefficients cannot be computed when only one stimulus is rated.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews.American Psychologist, 1984
- Intraclass correlations: There's more there than meets the eye.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- Can we describe an individual's personality? Agreement on stereotype versus individual attributes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- An Analysis of a Two-Way Model with Interaction and No ReplicationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1972