‘Evidence-based’, ‘Cost-Effective’ and ‘Preference-Driven’ Medicine: Decision Analysis Based Medical Decision Making is the Pre-Requisite
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
- Vol. 1 (2) , 104-113
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135581969600100208
Abstract
Three broad movements are seeking to change the world of medicine. The proponents of ‘evidence-based medicine’ are mainly concerned with ensuring that strategies of proven clinical effectiveness are adopted. Health economists are mainly concerned to establish that ‘cost-effectiveness’ and not ‘clinical effectiveness’ is the criterion used in determining option selection. A variety of patient support and public interest groups, including many health economists, are mainly concerned with ensuring that patient and public preferences drive clinical and policy decisions. This paper argues that decision analysis based medical decision making (DABMDM) constitutes the pre-requisite for the widespread introduction of the main principles embodied in evidence-based medicine, cost-effective medicine and preference-driven medicine; that, in the light of current modes of practice, seeking to promote these principles without a prior or simultaneous move to DABMDM is equivalent to asking the cart to move without the horse; and that in fact DABMDM subsumes and enjoins the valuable aspects of all three. Particular attention is paid to differentiating between DABMDM and EBM, by way of analysis of various expositions of EBM and examination of two recent empirical studies. EBM, as so far expounded, reflects a problem-solving attitude that results in a heavy concentration on RCTs and meta-analyses, rather than a broad decision making focus that concentrates on meeting all the requirements of a good clinical decision. The latter include: Ensuring that inferences from RCTs and meta-analyses to individual patients (or patient groups) are made explicitly; paying equally serious attention to evidence on values and costs as to clinical evidence; and accepting the inadequacy of ‘taking into account and bearing in mind’ as a way of integrating the multiple and distinct elements of a decision.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of "Accelerated" Tissue Plasminogen Activator with Streptokinase for Treatment of Suspected Myocardial InfarctionMedical Decision Making, 1995
- Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissentBMJ, 1995
- Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solvingBMJ, 1995
- Evidence based medicineBMJ, 1995
- Hindsight bias in reflective practice: an empirical investigation*Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1995
- Minimum Data Needed on Patient Preferences for Accurate, Efficient Medical Decision MakingMedical Care, 1995
- A comparison of graphical techniques for decision analysisEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1994
- Reflection: art, science or pseudo-scienceNurse Education Today, 1994
- Decision analysis in medicine.BMJ, 1992
- Adding Insult to InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983