Exploring rating scale responsiveness
- 25 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurology
- Vol. 62 (10) , 1842-1844
- https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000116136.22922.d6
Abstract
Evaluating rehabilitation requires rating scales that detect change. The authors examined Barthel Index (BI) data from 1,495 patients at a neurorehabilitation unit to determine whether total scale responsiveness accurately reflects item responsiveness. Total score effect sizes were moderate to large (0.47 to 1.09). Item-level effect sizes (0.13 to 1.16) reveal floor (3.5 to 82.3%) and ceiling (9.7 to 95.4%) effects. Results suggest BI total score effect sizes may hide item-level weaknesses and may underestimate the impact of rehabilitation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early intervention for acute back injury: can we finally develop an evidence-based approach?Clinical Rehabilitation, 2002
- Evidence-based measurementNeurology, 2001
- Outcome of Subacute Stroke RehabilitationStroke, 1998
- Central cord syndrome: functional outcome after rehabilitationSpinal Cord, 1998
- Evaluating neurological outcome measures: the bare essentials.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1996
- Responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile and the Barthel IndexJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health StatusMedical Care, 1989
- The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956