Must Good HMOs Go Bad? — The Commercialization of Prepaid Group Health Care
- 21 May 1998
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 338 (21) , 1558-1563
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199805213382123
Abstract
Prepaid group health care began in the 1940s as an insurgent, even radical form of medicine. At the time, few Americans had health insurance. The early programs would later be called group or staff models — closed systems with salaried doctors and an emphasis on prevention. The members sacrificed an often hypothetical freedom of choice for security and continuity of care. The doctors sacrificed independent, fee-for-service practice for a stable salary, a collegial setting, and a social ethic. Such plans were fiercely resisted by organized medicine.1,2 The shift in prepaid group health care from an insurgent social movement to . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends: Physician Earnings at Risk: An Examination of Capitated ContractsHealth Affairs, 1997
- Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes StudyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- The Contribution of Group- and Staff-Model HMOs to American MedicineThe Milbank Quarterly, 1996
- What Have HMOs Learned about Clinical Prevention Services? An Examination of the Experience at Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundThe Milbank Quarterly, 1996
- A National Survey of the Arrangements Managed-Care Plans Make with PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995