Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Using Intracardiac Electrograms: A Comparison of Unipolar Versus Bipolar Waveform Analysis
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 14 (3) , 427-433
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04091.x
Abstract
Implantable antitachycardia devices suffer a high false-positive rate of delivery of therapy because current detection schemes based upon ventricular rate and rate variations are excessively sensitive at the cost of specificity. Several methods have been proposed for providing complementary information derived from morphologic analysis of intraventricular electrograms in order to increase specificity. The majority of these techniques have utilized bipolar electrogram analysis to detect changes in ventricular activation indicative of ventricular tachycardia. Whether bipolar or unipolar intracardiac electrogram analysis might be preferred for discriminating ventricular tachycardia from sinus rhythm has not been determined. In this study, a previously demonstrated method for identification of ventricular tachycardia using intracardiac electrograms, correlation waveform analysis, was used to analyze both unipolar and bipolar signals during sinus rhythm and ventricular tachycardia recorded during electrophysiology studies of 15 patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Correlation waveform analysis consistently discriminated between all depolarizations during ventricular tachycardia in 14/15 patients (93%) using either electrogram configuration; 13 of the 14 patients were common to both groups. Of these patients, 8/15 (53%) had greater separation between sinus rhythm and ventricular waveforms with bipolar electrogram analysis while 7/15 (47%) had greater separation with unipolar electrogram analysis. We conclude that morphologic analysis of unipolar and bipolar electrograms may be equally effective in distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from sinus rhythm. For individual patients, either a unipolar or bipolar ventricular configuration may be preferable, and should be chosen on a patient-specific basis during electrophysiology study prior to antitachycardia device implantation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Bin Area Method: A Computationally Efficient Technique for Analysis of Ventricular and Atrial Intracardiac ElectrogramsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Paroxysmal Bundle Branch Block of Supraventricular Origin: A Possible Source of Misdiagnosis in Detecting Ventricular Tachycardia Using Time Domain Analyses of Intraventricular ElectrogramsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Discrimination of Retrograde from Anterograde Atrial Activation Using Intracardiac Electrogram Waveform AnalysisPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Evaluation of techniques for recognition of ventricular arrhythmias by implanted devicesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1989
- Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Using Intracavitary Ventricular Electrograms: Analysis of Time and Frequency Domain PatternsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Changes in cycle length at the onset of sustained tachycardias—importance for antitachycardiac pacingAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- ReplyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator.Circulation, 1985
- Potential Hazards of Implanted Devices for the Electrical Control of TachyarrhythmiasPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984
- Maximal Rate of Tachycardia Development: Sinus Tachycardia with Sudden Exercise vs. Spontaneous Ventricular TachycardiaPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983