Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence
- 8 January 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 9 (4) , 290-301
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01116.x
Abstract
Objective The current optimal management of locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved from surgical excision followed by postoperative therapy in patients with involved margins, to an increasing use of a preoperative strategy to ‘down‐stage and/or down‐size’ the tumour. This treatment strategy is based on the relationship of the tumour to the mesorectal fascia, the optimal surgical circumferential resection margin that can be achieved by total mesorectal excision. We have reviewed the recent evidence for this strategy.Method An electronic literature search using PubMed identified articles on the subject of rectal cancer between January 2000 and December 2005. The search was limited to English language publications with secondary references obtained from key articles. Articles published in high impact factor journals formed the basis of the review, together with articles related to national programmes on the management of rectal cancer. This does lead to a selection bias, particularly as the articles identified had a European bias.Conclusion The UK NHS Cancer Plan has outlined the basis for the multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of rectal cancer. Advances in preoperative assessment through accurate staging and the recognition of the importance of the relationship of the tumour to the mesorectal fascia has allowed the selection of patients for a preoperative strategy to down‐size/down‐stage the tumour if this fascial layer is involved or threatened. Improvements in the quality of surgical resection through the acceptance of the principle of total mesorectal excision have ensured that optimal surgery remains the cornerstone to successful treatment. Further refinements of the MDT process strive to improve outcome. Accurate radiological staging, optimal surgery and detailed histopathological assessment together with consideration of a preoperative neoadjuvant strategy should now form the basis for current treatment and future research in rectal cancer.Keywords
This publication has 96 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in StockholmBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national levelBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Recurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2002
- The Stockholm II trial on preoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinomaCancer, 2001
- Rectal CancerArchives of Surgery, 1998
- Definition of local recurrence after surgery for rectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Mesorectal excision for rectal cancerThe Lancet, 1993
- Local recurrence of rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1987
- Distal intramural spread of rectal carcinomasDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1986