Maximization and the Act of Choice
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by JSTOR in Econometrica
- Vol. 65 (4) , 745-779
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2171939
Abstract
The act of choosing can have particular relevance in maximizing behavior for at least two distinct reasons: (1) process significance (preferences may be sensitive to the choice process, including the identity of the chooser), and (2) decisional inescapability (choices may have to be made whether or not the judgemental process has been completed). The general approach of maximizing behavior can - appropriately formulated - accommodate both concerns, but the regularities of choice behavior assumed in standard models of rational choice will need significant modification. These differences have considerable relevance in studies of economic, social, and political behavior.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND SOCIAL CHOICE: CONTINGENT VALUATION AND THE MARKET ANALOGYThe Japanese Economic Review, 1995
- Rational normative economics vs ‘social welfare’ and ‘social choice’European Economic Review, 1994
- Minimal LibertyEconomica, 1992
- Welfare, preference and freedomJournal of Econometrics, 1991
- Social Choice Theory: A Re-ExaminationEconometrica, 1977
- Degrees of Cardinality and Aggregate Partial OrderingsEconometrica, 1975
- Behaviour and the Concept of PreferenceEconomica, 1973
- Sur l'extension de l'ordre partielFundamenta Mathematicae, 1930