Redox Properties of Mesophilic and Hyperthermophilic Rubredoxins as a Function of Pressure and Temperature
- 26 May 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Biochemistry
- Vol. 38 (24) , 7874-7880
- https://doi.org/10.1021/bi990322j
Abstract
The formal equilibrium reduction potentials of recombinant electron transport protein, rubredoxin (MW = 7500 Da), from both the mesophilic Clostridium pasteurianum (Topt = 37 °C) and hyperthermophilic Pyrococcus furiosus (Topt = 95 °C) were recorded as a function of pressure and temperature. Measurements were made utilizing a specially designed stainless steel electrochemical cell that easily maintains pressures between 1 and 600 atm and a temperature-controlled cell that maintains temperatures between 4 and 100 °C. The reduction potential of P. furiosus rubredoxin was determined to be 31 mV at 25 °C and 1 atm, −93 mV at 95 °C and 1 atm, and 44 mV at 25 °C and 400 atm. Thus, the reduction potential of P. furiosus rubredoxin obtained under standard conditions is likely to be dramatically different from the reduction potential obtained under its normal operating conditions. Thermodynamic parameters associated with electron transfer were determined for both rubredoxins (for C. pasteurianum, ΔV° = −27 mL/mol, ΔS° = −36 cal K-1 mol-1, and ΔH° = −10 kcal/mol, and for P. furiosus, ΔV° = −31 mL/mol, ΔS° = −41 cal K-1 mol-1, and ΔH° = −13 kcal/mol) from its pressure− and temperature−reduction potential profiles. The thermodynamic parameters for electron transfer (ΔV°, ΔS°, and ΔH°) for both proteins were very similar, which is not surprising considering their structural similarities and sequence homology. Despite the fact that these two proteins exhibit dramatic differences in thermostability, it appears that structural changes that confer dramatic differences in thermostability do not significantly alter electron transfer reactivity. The experimental changes in reduction potential as a function of pressure and temperature were simulated using a continuum dielectric electrostatic model (DELPHI). A reasonable estimate of the protein dielectric constant (εprotein) of 6 for both rubredoxins was determined from these simulations. A discussion is presented regarding the analysis of electrostatic interaction energies of biomolecules through pressure- and temperature-controlled electrochemical studies.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Charge-Transfer Interactions in Macromolecular Systems: A New View of the Protein/Water InterfaceJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1998
- A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic MoleculesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1995
- Proteins under pressureEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1994
- Electrochemical measurements at high pressure: solvation and the thermodynamics of electron-transfer reactionsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1992
- A temperature-controlled, anaerobic cell for direct electrochemical studiesAnalytical Biochemistry, 1992
- Protein electrochemistry at high pressureJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1992
- Calculation of electrostatic potentials in an enzyme active siteNature, 1987
- ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS IN MEMBRANES AND PROTEINSAnnual Review of Biophysics, 1986
- Models for ferredoxins: electronic structures of iron-sulfur clusters with one, two, and four iron atomsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1985
- Crystallographic refinement of rubredoxin at 1·2 Å resolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1980