Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: Review of methods, utility, and limitations
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
- Vol. 25 (2) , 110-131
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810250207
Abstract
Coronary angiography continues to be the pivotal study in the diagnosis and treatment of ischemic cardiac disease. Although angiographic equipment and imaging techniques have advanced over the past three decades, the analysis of coronary angiograms, by visual estimated percent diameter stenosis, has remained unchanged in most clinical catheterization laboratories. Rapid, computerized angiographic analysis systems are now available that remedy the inherent imprecision and inaccuracies plaguing visual coronary analysis. Despite its advantages, successful QCA is quite dependent on meticulous attention to radiographic and angiographic technique, even more so than with visual analysis. Although the available QCA systems can reproducibly and accurately define the site and degree of coronary stenosis, they cannot routinely determine whether an obstruction is flow limiting. Several methods, some based on extrapolations of quantitative measures alone, and others based on digital subtraction angiography, have been developed to determine the physiologic impact of a given coronary lesion. Recent observations have demonstrated, however, that even if the physiologic consequences of an obstruction are known, the prognosis of the lesion over time cannot be predicted. The qualitative, morphologic characteristics of a lesion are as, or more, important than the quantitative lesion attributes in determining an atheroma's behavior and stability, and hence, qualitative descriptors should be incorporated into QCA analyses. Although not currently available, future QCA systems will provide, by automated analysis, reproducible and accurate measures of absolute obstruction, physiologic data describing the flow limiting characteristics of a lesion, and qualitative, morphologic lesion descriptors. Implementation of these systems should provide more consistent and accurate prognostic and pathophysiologic information, thereby helping to refine and more effectively direct therapeutic interventions in coronary artery disease.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduction in the Rate of Early Restenosis after Coronary Angioplasty by a Diet Supplemented with n–3 Fatty AcidsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Paradoxical Vasoconstriction Induced by Acetylcholine in Atherosclerotic Coronary ArteriesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Coronary Angioscopy in Patients with Unstable Angina PectorisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Rethrombosis after reperfusion with streptokinase: importance of geometry of residual lesions.Circulation, 1984
- Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms.Circulation, 1983
- Quantitative coronary angiography: measurement of the "critical" stenosis in patients with unstable angina and single-vessel disease without collaterals.Circulation, 1979
- Quantitative coronary arteriography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using the arteriogram and digital computation.Circulation, 1977
- Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.Circulation, 1977